Earlier this year, I was contacted by the Nestle/Gerber people. Using flattery as their first tool, , I was told that "they" were so impressed by my website and experience. (Snake in the grass, getting ready to bite!) Here it comes....would I please help them out, and review the breastfeeding information for their "infant feeding hot line"? I would be handsomely paid, she said. Of course, I declined thinking I'd rather stick a needle in my eye than associate myself with a formula manufacturer whose unethical marketing practices have reached higher heights - the formula sponsored breastfeeding hot line!
Abbott and other formula companies have escalated their marketing campaigns due to dropping birth rates and more mothers breastfeeding. Many parenting websites, blogs, medical practices and hospitals have been successfully lured into the lion's den by wholeheartedly recommending the formula company's (Abbott & Nestle/Gerber) infant feeding hot lines. Are they stupid or what? That's as bad as the smoking cessation hotline by Winston! Let's just help Abbot, even more than ever, in its drive to cause more mothers to purchase Similac formula products.....OMG!
Mothers Beware!!! This is what happens: when you call the phone number provided by Abbott you reach Life Care, a company who has also been duped into marketing infant formula for Abbott. The person you reach is not an IBCLC, but an employee who has taken an on-line course in breastfeeding. You see, IBCLCs do not work for formula companies because it presents a conflict of interest. So you are being mislead into thinking that the breastfeeding help is coming from someone credentialed to do so.
This is a huge problem because mothers are receiving inappropriate information. I know because I, myself called to check it out, posing as a new mom with a two week old, worried I didn't have enough milk (sound familiar). I was, of course, told by the "breastfeeding expert" to pump and mix formula with my breastmilk! These are situations that are serious and adverse effects could be suffered by both mom and baby.
So now, companies like Babble.com who is pimping formula for Abbott and WedMD, whose infant feeding section is completely sponsored by Gerber (Nestle). are placing mothers and babies at risk. Would your doctor refer you to a specialist who was not licensed or certified? I hope not! Well, referring moms to a 'resource' which is not qualified to deliver the correct information is just that....irresponsible!
Formula companies do not care about you or your baby! They just care about making money, as much money as they possibly can which, as we know, is never enough money! Please tell them you are not falling for their portrayed image of community service(hot line). Please tell me you will not be duped into buying more of their products with this new ploy!
Keep a sharp watch because the phone number is always the same 800-986-8800 but advertized several different ways like; Feeding Expert or 24 hr Free Lactation Consultant (lie!)or Feeding Advisor 24 hr/day
Again, these are operators (who took a short on-line course) that work for Life Care, not breastfeeding experts!
Tell them you are smarter than that! By bringing this to the attention of anyone you know. If you see your doctor, hospital, favorite website or business recommending this number, bring this error to their attention. We should give them the benefit of the doubt, (first time offense only) many of them do not even realise the harm they are doing.
So take a minute and ask Babble.com to stop peddling formula for Abbott, ask WebMD to stop peddling formula for Nestle. Then, when you are done with that, report Life Care to the Connecticut state attorney general’s office and Abbott to the Illinois state attorney general’s office. Lastly, complaints can also be sent to the Better Business Bureau in Connecticut and Illinois..........just in case you needed some direction!
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Saturday, August 14, 2010
US Babies: Bottomfeeders, not Breastfeeders
Why is breastfeeding in the US considered a "lifestyle" choice and not a medical one? Why is formula promoted by our medical community and used so casually by our society as a whole? What is at the root of all this? MONEY! Why have we put money ahead of what is best for our babies? I found myself stewing over that tonight (thus the post at 5 am!)
What set off my stewing session, you ask? Well, last evening I received an e-mail announcement from a small breastfeeding garment company that said it has affiliated itself with a popular non-profit breastfeeding website. Apparently, this garment company will be donating 5% of the sale of it's (overpriced) garment to the "cause" of said website. And, of course blogged about her reasons for doing so.
I'd like to share with you the "credo" of this popular website, "ALL moms deserve to make an informed feeding decision, and to be cheered on, coached and celebrated without pressure, judgement or guilt, whether they breastfeed for 2 days, 2 months, 2 years or not at all. ALL breastfeeding moms deserve to succeed & have a positive breastfeeding experience without being "booby trapped".
May sound OK but unfortunately, most of their breastfeeding information is bad and not "current or evidence based" as they claim and laden with "booby traps" that actually hurt a baby's chance to breastfeed, not help them. OOOPS! DID I SAY BABIES INSTEAD OF MOTHERS? YOU BET I DID! That's all this website needs, more donations to commercialize and undermine breastfeeding.
So I thought, why would a popular breastfeeding website risk promoting information that was incorrect and damaging? Then suddenly I got it! If you have the money to advertise with them.......your in!
No matter what information you present on or about breastfeeding if it comes with a fat check, it's good.
Let's not forget, non-profits are businesses to and very lucrative ones at that.
So, since babies don't have money, they are under represented, if at all. Marketing and information is aimed towards the peeps with the green! These businesses are all about the parent (consumer) disguised as for the baby......clever yet unethical. That's why all the "stuff" for babies including websites and books about baby care are not truly baby-friendly. Just think of the time and money parents spend
on-line, reading baby books and putting together apparatus instead of just holding and paying attention to the best expert they will ever have....their own baby!
Another issue I have is this "soft" approach to promoting breastfeeding, by basically placating women who choose to do otherwise. This has been the new craze for over a year now. We are guilt-free and responsibility-free now thanks to the new crop of so- called breastfeeding advocates.
Is it me or does anyone give a crap about the babies! Let me be frank(ha!), most of the women in the US who "fail" at breastfeeding or "have to stop", do so for personal/selfish reasons, not medical ones.
Why is it so easy to dismiss what our baby needs and loves, for our wants, not needs? Those are two different things!
Money, professional status, houses, cars, vacations..........does a baby care about any of that? Let me ask, can we possibly conceive doing with less? Do we really need the new SUV when we are having our first baby? Do we really need the bigger house in the fancier neighborhood (that we have no time to be acquainted with) and the better schools if our child is a newborn? Does every child have to have their own bedroom and bathroom? Really? Would it kill us to stay home from work for at least one year? Many women say," I enjoy work, I do it for me." Ya know what, you have the rest of your life to work and guess what....this isn't about you! Others say, "I pumped at work so my son had breastmilk only for the first year." That's not the point. He didn't have you.
The "you can have it all" myth is just that, a myth, not just for you but your for your baby. OOOPS! There I go again with the baby mentioning! You can have a baby,work full-time, breastfeed, bottlefeed, raise that child, have more children, work some more, oh yeah and be married.....sounds like fun! You can have a nice, big house, several nice cars, nice schools, nice vacations and lots of nice possessions. Unfortunately, what isn't nice is that you had to work your butt off the whole time and sacrificed some precious, impressionable years. Is that the life you envisioned? Is this the legacy we want to leave?
The babies? Not only don't they get what they want...they don't get what they need...their moms.
The breastfeeding? Well the women who successfully breastfeed for at least a year are predominantly stay-at-home moms. Most of the women who go back to work by 3 months will fail at breastfeeding. Why? For one, it's too damn early to go back to work! Your baby and your breasts need you, not a pump. Reason two, caregivers stuff and overfeed the babies to make them sleep! Those who have tried to "keep up" with that know what I am talking about. Companies who make breastpumps are out to make money!!! HELLO? Your breasts are made for your baby to feed from, not for a milking machine.
So in the end, who really suffers? The babies. They have "to do" with substandard food (at best) in place of your milk. Not only does it taste disgusting but now they are placed at risk medically, not to mention the emotional/physical separation associated with bottlefeeding. Also they have to deal with others taking care of them at an early age. This is not right.
It always suprises me that most parents have never read the ingredients in the formula that they feed their children yet they shop at Whole Foods. I'd like to share with you the ingredients right from the side of a can of Similac Isomil Advanced formula. Here goes from the top:
43.2% corn syrup solids, 14.6% soy protein isolate, 11.5% safflower oil, 10.3% sugar(sucrose),
8.4% soy oil, 7.7% coconut oil......need I go on?
Mothers ask me, "Is there one formula that is better than another?" I say, "No". They are all crap, just breastfeed! Don't think the "organic" is any better. The only organic milk for babies is breastmilk!
So if you added up daycare, pumps and equipment associated with pumping, formula (because you will need it) and the equipment for that, the costs of returning to work (clothes, transportation etc), increased medical because you and your child will be sicker, loss of work due to illness, well you might as well just stay home and raise the child yourself. Trust me, you'd be happier and most importantly your baby would be happier and healthier both physically and emotionally.
To really let you know how I feel (ha!)....the way we conduct our lives in this country is an embarrassment. We have to do better by our babies. Like, I have said in previous posts, we cannot wait for our government, corporations or medical community to help us and our family. Why? Because they are the problem! They have put money first, before everything and everyone but themselves.
Yet, that doesn't mean you have to.
So if you want to help "the cause." PUT YOUR BABY FIRST!!!! If you don't, who will? WE as moms need to start saying, "NO" to work, "NO" to formula and "YES to staying home, and "YES to breastfeeding. Only then, will we be able to pull babies up from the bottom of our society to the top where they belong.
I'd like to share with you the "credo" of this popular website, "ALL moms deserve to make an informed feeding decision, and to be cheered on, coached and celebrated without pressure, judgement or guilt, whether they breastfeed for 2 days, 2 months, 2 years or not at all. ALL breastfeeding moms deserve to succeed & have a positive breastfeeding experience without being "booby trapped".
May sound OK but unfortunately, most of their breastfeeding information is bad and not "current or evidence based" as they claim and laden with "booby traps" that actually hurt a baby's chance to breastfeed, not help them. OOOPS! DID I SAY BABIES INSTEAD OF MOTHERS? YOU BET I DID! That's all this website needs, more donations to commercialize and undermine breastfeeding.
So I thought, why would a popular breastfeeding website risk promoting information that was incorrect and damaging? Then suddenly I got it! If you have the money to advertise with them.......your in!
No matter what information you present on or about breastfeeding if it comes with a fat check, it's good.
Let's not forget, non-profits are businesses to and very lucrative ones at that.
So, since babies don't have money, they are under represented, if at all. Marketing and information is aimed towards the peeps with the green! These businesses are all about the parent (consumer) disguised as for the baby......clever yet unethical. That's why all the "stuff" for babies including websites and books about baby care are not truly baby-friendly. Just think of the time and money parents spend
Another issue I have is this "soft" approach to promoting breastfeeding, by basically placating women who choose to do otherwise. This has been the new craze for over a year now. We are guilt-free and responsibility-free now thanks to the new crop of so- called breastfeeding advocates.
Is it me or does anyone give a crap about the babies! Let me be frank(ha!), most of the women in the US who "fail" at breastfeeding or "have to stop", do so for personal/selfish reasons, not medical ones.
Why is it so easy to dismiss what our baby needs and loves, for our wants, not needs? Those are two different things!
Money, professional status, houses, cars, vacations..........does a baby care about any of that? Let me ask, can we possibly conceive doing with less? Do we really need the new SUV when we are having our first baby? Do we really need the bigger house in the fancier neighborhood (that we have no time to be acquainted with) and the better schools if our child is a newborn? Does every child have to have their own bedroom and bathroom? Really? Would it kill us to stay home from work for at least one year? Many women say," I enjoy work, I do it for me." Ya know what, you have the rest of your life to work and guess what....this isn't about you! Others say, "I pumped at work so my son had breastmilk only for the first year." That's not the point. He didn't have you.
The "you can have it all" myth is just that, a myth, not just for you but your for your baby. OOOPS! There I go again with the baby mentioning! You can have a baby,work full-time, breastfeed, bottlefeed, raise that child, have more children, work some more, oh yeah and be married.....sounds like fun! You can have a nice, big house, several nice cars, nice schools, nice vacations and lots of nice possessions. Unfortunately, what isn't nice is that you had to work your butt off the whole time and sacrificed some precious, impressionable years. Is that the life you envisioned? Is this the legacy we want to leave?
The babies? Not only don't they get what they want...they don't get what they need...their moms.
The breastfeeding? Well the women who successfully breastfeed for at least a year are predominantly stay-at-home moms. Most of the women who go back to work by 3 months will fail at breastfeeding. Why? For one, it's too damn early to go back to work! Your baby and your breasts need you, not a pump. Reason two, caregivers stuff and overfeed the babies to make them sleep! Those who have tried to "keep up" with that know what I am talking about. Companies who make breastpumps are out to make money!!! HELLO? Your breasts are made for your baby to feed from, not for a milking machine.
So in the end, who really suffers? The babies. They have "to do" with substandard food (at best) in place of your milk. Not only does it taste disgusting but now they are placed at risk medically, not to mention the emotional/physical separation associated with bottlefeeding. Also they have to deal with others taking care of them at an early age. This is not right.
It always suprises me that most parents have never read the ingredients in the formula that they feed their children yet they shop at Whole Foods. I'd like to share with you the ingredients right from the side of a can of Similac Isomil Advanced formula. Here goes from the top:
43.2% corn syrup solids, 14.6% soy protein isolate, 11.5% safflower oil, 10.3% sugar(sucrose),
8.4% soy oil, 7.7% coconut oil......need I go on?
Mothers ask me, "Is there one formula that is better than another?" I say, "No". They are all crap, just breastfeed! Don't think the "organic" is any better. The only organic milk for babies is breastmilk!
So if you added up daycare, pumps and equipment associated with pumping, formula (because you will need it) and the equipment for that, the costs of returning to work (clothes, transportation etc), increased medical because you and your child will be sicker, loss of work due to illness, well you might as well just stay home and raise the child yourself. Trust me, you'd be happier and most importantly your baby would be happier and healthier both physically and emotionally.
To really let you know how I feel (ha!)....the way we conduct our lives in this country is an embarrassment. We have to do better by our babies. Like, I have said in previous posts, we cannot wait for our government, corporations or medical community to help us and our family. Why? Because they are the problem! They have put money first, before everything and everyone but themselves.
Yet, that doesn't mean you have to.
So if you want to help "the cause." PUT YOUR BABY FIRST!!!! If you don't, who will? WE as moms need to start saying, "NO" to work, "NO" to formula and "YES to staying home, and "YES to breastfeeding. Only then, will we be able to pull babies up from the bottom of our society to the top where they belong.
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Blind-Sided by a Prejudice System
![]() |
| Serena and my brother Billy in the sensory room at the NFB Convention |
National Federation of the Blind Successful in Returning Infant to Her Parents
"Family Reunited After Wrongful Seizure of Child "
Independence, Missouri (July 22, 2010):
The National Federation of the Blind (NFB) and its Missouri affiliate announced today that they have succeeded in a legal fight to bring a two-month-old infant, Mikaela Sinnett, home to her parents, Blake Sinnett and Erika Johnson of Independence. The NFB of Missouri hired an attorney to assist the couple after Mikaela was taken from them at Centerpoint Hospital almost immediately after she was born. For fifty-seven days the couple, both of whom are blind, were allowed to visit their child in foster care but were not allowed to bring her home. The sole reason given by Missouri’s Department of Social Services was that the couple was blind and could not properly care for Mikaela without the assistance of a sighted person twenty-four hours a day and seven days a week. An evidentiary hearing was scheduled for July 20, but at the last minute the state of Missouri dismissed the case against the couple.
Dr. Marc Maurer, President of the National Federation of the Blind, said: “The National Federation of the Blind is pleased that the state of Missouri has dismissed its case against Blake Sinnett and Erika Johnson and returned baby Mikaela to their care. Despite the fact that blind parents are successfully raising children across the nation, blind Americans continue to find that misconceptions and stereotypes about the capabilities of blind people too often result in hasty and unwarranted decisions to remove children from the custody of blind parents. The worst nightmare of parents everywhere—having a child taken away—is sadly part of the lives of too many blind parents. The National Federation of the Blind stands ready and willing to help state officials across the country understand how blind people use alternative techniques to care for their children. But the blind of America will not tolerate our children being taken from us.”
"We were and are outraged at the action of Centerpoint Hospital and the state of Missouri," said Gary Wunder, president of the National Federation of the Blind of Missouri. "Children's services have the job of protecting children from abuse and we have nothing but admiration for that work. Taking a child away because her parents are blind is an entirely different matter which violates state and federal law. We have gotten Mikaela back home, but we must fundamentally change a system that presumes the incompetence of blind parents and operates on a principle of guilty until proven innocent rather than the reverse. We cannot help but think that new parents who are blind in Missouri will avoid seeking medical and social services that they may need for fear that they will experience a similar ordeal. We can never give back the two months this family has lost, nor can we restore to Erika the joy of nursing her child that this separation has made impossible. What we can do is use their adversity to change the system that allowed this atrocity and educate the people who have mistakenly equated blindness with a lack of perception, intellect, and judgment."
On May 21, 2010, Erika and Blake went to Centerpoint Hospital, where Erika delivered Mikaela. When trying to nurse the baby for the first time, Erika asked for assistance from a nurse when she thought something was wrong. The nurse said that the baby was turning blue and helped reposition the baby, who then began to take nourishment. The nurse assured Erika that it was common for new mothers to need some instruction and that she was doing fine. Blake and Erika were therefore surprised when, some four hours later, they were met by a children's services worker who made inquiries about their vision; asked how they would feed, diaper, and supervise their child; and eventually decreed that Baby Mikaela would not be allowed to be discharged with her mother unless the social worker could be assured there would be constant supervision by someone with sight. On the recommendation of Missouri's Children's Protective Services, Mikaela was placed in foster care and one-hour visits were arranged for several times each week. When the National Federation of the Blind of Missouri determined that blindness was the only reason the child was taken by the state, the organization hired attorney Amy Coopman to handle the case. The National Federation of the Blind now has the option to file complaints with the Missouri Human Rights Commission and/or the federal Office for Civil Rights, as well as at least three options that can be pursued in the state’s courts.
The trauma to these poor people, I can only imagine. The separation and lost breastfeeding opportunity for this mom and baby....it just made me sick! (I did contact a consultant who is willing to help Erica initiate and enjoy some nursing again, if she so wishes)
My neice, Serena aspires to get married and have children, as is her right and privilage. She is by far one of the most intuitive women I have ever known, as many non-sighted people are, and would make a wonderful mom!. So we have to make sure that what happened to this couple, never happens again.
The trauma to these poor people, I can only imagine. The separation and lost breastfeeding opportunity for this mom and baby....it just made me sick! (I did contact a consultant who is willing to help Erica initiate and enjoy some nursing again, if she so wishes)
My neice, Serena aspires to get married and have children, as is her right and privilage. She is by far one of the most intuitive women I have ever known, as many non-sighted people are, and would make a wonderful mom!. So we have to make sure that what happened to this couple, never happens again.
It's OK to be blind and also be a parent!!!
"--blind people can lead normal lives complete with a job,
a family, friendships, fun, and involvement in community life."
Thursday, July 1, 2010
Stress of Our Sisters
Stress kills. There has been enough research to prove that. But is stress killing our mothers and babies, especially our black mothers and babies? I say, yes!
First, here is the recent evidence of racial disparity related to maternal /child health:
• A recent NY Times article stated that black women in New York are seven times more likely to die in childbirth than white women.
• An article in a University of Wisconsin alumni magazine, said babies born in Sri Lanka have better health outcomes than black babies born in Milwaukee.
• Another study appeared in the Journal of Community Health concluding, despite socioeconomic differences, fatherless children born to black women had a seven-fold risk of death in contrast to infants born to Hispanic and white women in similar situations.
Now, a quick lesson, about how the human body copes with acute stress. Cortisol “the stress hormone” is released in increased amounts during stress and in turn, helps regulate the body’s many functions
• Proper glucose metabolism, regulation of blood pressure, insulin release for blood sugar maintenance,
immune function, inflammatory response.
Small increases of cortisol have some positive effects:
• a quick burst of energy for survival reasons, heightened memory functions, a burst of increase immunity, lower sensitivity to pain, helps maintain equilibrium in the body.
The problem: while cortisol will return to normal following a stressful event, in our current high-stress culture, the body’s stress response is activated so often that it doesn’t always have a chance to return to normal, resulting in a state of chronic stress.
Most importantly, the higher and more prolonged levels of cortisol in the bloodstream (like those associated with chronic stress) the higher the negative effects, like:
• Impaired cognitive performance, suppressed thyroid function, blood sugar imbalances such as hyperglycemia, decreased bone density, decrease in muscle tissue, higher blood pressure, lowered immunity and inflammatory responses, slowed wound healing.
• Increased abdominal fat, which is associated with a greater amount of health problems than fat deposited in other areas of the body. Some of the health problems associated with increased stomach fat are heart attacks, strokes, the development of metabolic syndrome, higher levels of “bad” cholesterol (LDL) and lower levels of “good” cholesterol (HDL), which can lead to other health problems!
Now, let’s put this in context with a pregnant black woman. It doesn’t matter if she is rich or poor, good neighborhood or bad, educated or uneducated, single or partnered. It is safe to assume that most women are under emotional and physical stress when pregnant. Isn’t it telling that the same medical conditions given for the poor outcomes of pregnant black women are the same conditions resulting from high, chronic stress, for instance, obesity, high blood pressure, high blood sugar and infection? So it must be that black women exhibit or internalize stress at a higher level than their counterparts.
Now for the babies, a mother’s stress level, during pregnancy directly impacts the baby’s physical and emotional health. Research has linked this with preterm delivery, lower birth weight, “The common conception that a mother’s psychological state can influence her unborn baby is to some extent substantiated by the literature,” write Ali S. Khashan, M.Sc., of the University of Manchester, England, and colleagues. “Severe life events during pregnancy are consistently associated with an elevated risk of low birth weight and prematurity.” Chemicals released as part of the mother’s stress response may have an effect on the fetus’ developing brain.
What can be done? If we were to conclude that chronic stress leads to persistent high cortisol levels, which then leads to all these health complications for mothers and babies, how do we fix that? Can we step into someone’s life and eliminate their stress? No. But I do think we can help them limit their exposure, possibly and lessen their body’s response to stress. So they can manage their stress better.
Let’s face it. If you do not address the “inner reasons” someone overeats or is depressed, you can conduct all the nutrition classes you want but they will not work. We need to give women the tools to cope with the multitude of stressors they faces on a daily basis. People have overcome tremendously stressful situations with 12 step work so I propose “The 12 Step Program for Pregnancy”
I am thinking of a program similar to many12 step programs. Support groups for pregnant and new mothers listening and learning from each other. Basing the program on many of the slogans and doctrine of successful 12 step programs, for instance, One Day at a Time, Live and Let Live, Think, Let Go/ Let God, Keep It Simple, the serenity prayer also choosing a sponsor, having a call list and weekly meetings. These are simple and effective principals anyone can learn. Along with classes in guided imagery, journaling, self-hypnosis, exercise, yoga, music, breathing exercises and meditation in the prenatal period and postpartum for the first year.
Promoting healthy, coping skills that can be applied to anyone, at any time, would be a proactive, low cost intervention. Supporting the management of stress through finding serenity, our pregnant mothers would benefit from a new way of thinking, a new way of acting, giving them and their babies a new lease on life.
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Happy Father's Day to All You Awesome Dad's!!!!!
My Father’s Love
A warm embrace
His bristled face
The voice no person can replace
A steady stride
Chest held in pride
My hand held in his, side by side
Safe, secure,
Always sure
No harm I’ll ever see
With strong admire
I’ll never tire
Of my father’s love for me.
By Maria Parlapiano
6/2010
Monday, June 7, 2010
Relative Insanity
I spent the weekend with my family over Memorial Day. My father, aunts and uncles are all in their late 70’s- early 80’s. Like most Italian families, we sit around the dinner table for hours talking (which I love). Since we are obsessed about food, any kind of food, the conversation always includes discussions over food and the eating of it. In my case, it ends up being about breastfeeding(this happens to me no matter where I am).
Well, the truth is, we were far from fine! As infants, multiple illnesses and hospitalizations for dehydration caused by vomiting and diarrhea were common but yet that was considered normal and "fine." Even though we all had colic, well, “all babies have colic.” As a matter of fact, my aunt said that she had to stop putting Karo Syrup in my cousin, Lorraine’s formula because “she didn’t tolerate it too good”. Just a day after being home from the hospital (at 1 week old), we were fed cereal in our bottles....every day! Take a look at my baby picture at one year old. I look like a block of cheese on shoulders!
I have eighteen cousins on that side of the family. As adults, we are all overweight, some morbidly. Food, environmental and medication allergies, cancer, lupus, diabetes, pituitary and digestive issues are suffered by almost all. Yet in our relative’s eyes, we are "just fine". They refuse to see any correlation to how we may have been fed as infants to our present health. It’s an argument we will never win.
When it came to breastfeeding our own children, my cousins and I were quite successful. Too successful, as far as some of our relatives were concerned, especially since we nursed long-term. We supported each other and reveled in our accomplishment. Break through the barriers of misinformation and mythology and without the guidance of our own mothers, breastfeeding was ours and we proudly owned it. I remember at a family get-together one Easter, there were eight of us (cousins) nursing in my parent’s living room. As my Uncle Skeeter passed through the room, he covered his eyes yelling, “Do you have to do that here?” We retorted, happily, “Yep, here, there and everywhere............need a little cream in your coffee?!”
None of my cousins or I, were breastfed. When asked why, both my aunts shrieked, “What are you crazy?” Even after I acknowledged that breastfeeding was vastly discouraged, they disclosed that they would never have breastfed, even if it were encouraged. “They gave you a shot and it was all over.”, my Aunt Grace added. Remember, this was when women stayed in the hospital for a whole week (1950’s-1960’s) and never saw their babies at night. My Aunt Ellie exclaimed, “We needed our rest!” Yeah, I guess so, in order to go home to sterilize bottles and create from a recipe, a formula mixture also wash more clothing and diapers due to spit up and diarrhea. I've learned over the years that discussing the many benefits of breastfeeding gets you nowhere with these people, (even though I still try) because they fully believe that my cousins and I were “just fine” then and are “just fine” now.
I have eighteen cousins on that side of the family. As adults, we are all overweight, some morbidly. Food, environmental and medication allergies, cancer, lupus, diabetes, pituitary and digestive issues are suffered by almost all. Yet in our relative’s eyes, we are "just fine". They refuse to see any correlation to how we may have been fed as infants to our present health. It’s an argument we will never win.
Just as a caveat, I would like to clarify that my parents were extremely supportive of my breastfeeding. My mom grieved over the fact that she was not encouraged more to nurse us. Never did my father make a contradictory remark or choose to leave the room when anyone nursed….I was blessed. As a matter of fact, my maternal grandmother wet- nursed a couple of babies, back in the 1930’s, after their mothers died in childbirth.
When it came to breastfeeding our own children, my cousins and I were quite successful. Too successful, as far as some of our relatives were concerned, especially since we nursed long-term. We supported each other and reveled in our accomplishment. Break through the barriers of misinformation and mythology and without the guidance of our own mothers, breastfeeding was ours and we proudly owned it. I remember at a family get-together one Easter, there were eight of us (cousins) nursing in my parent’s living room. As my Uncle Skeeter passed through the room, he covered his eyes yelling, “Do you have to do that here?” We retorted, happily, “Yep, here, there and everywhere............need a little cream in your coffee?!”
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Vivid Mammaries
Today my son, Peter turns 26. Yes, I am older than I look! (Ha!) It was the 1980's, big hair, leg warmers, parachute pants - I had it all go'in on! Every year, on my kid's birthdays, I reminisce. When they were little, I would tell the tale of the day they were born. I embellished some (you know how I love to do that!) making it the most exciting day in history of the world! (they loved it)
Like most women, those events are as vivid today as they were then, you will always remember everything about that day. So, I'd like to share Peter's birthday with you. He was a VBAC delivery (vaginal birth after cesarean) 9:30 pm at Overlook Hospital.(one of the first ever done there, 1984) It required that I change doctors. My first OB, who sectioned me two years earlier, told me that I could only delivery approx. a 7lb baby. When I asked how he knew that he said, “I just know these things.” Wow, he must be like superman and have X-ray vision, I thought. (Peter was born 8.8!)
So I fired and hired the next OB. Sheila B.,was a young, new, single practitioner who had a thriving business. We would sit for hours in her waiting room and socialize until she was ready to see us. Sheila spent alot of quality time with her patients so she was worth the wait.
With Peter, I was in labor for 18 hours of which she stayed with me the whole time.. Knowing I wanted to deliver vaginally, she took all the proper precautions (there were probes and wires everywhere!) When all was said and done, (yes, with lots of intervention like pitocin, epidural, vacuum extraction)…he was out! At the time, I thought I did pretty well. After all, I didn’t have a c-section. As I often tell people, I was trained as an ER nurse so intervention and machines, were my “comfort zone”. It wasn’t until I had my next child that I had a natural delivery (she was 8.15!) Ya know what they say, "Three's a charm!"
I still giggle thinking about my first child, Nicole, who was so hairy. I remember saying to my husband, “Forget a college fund, we’d better save up for electrolysis!” ( this is a girl who went on to shave the tops of her forearms in high school). I also jokingly blamed my husband, “It’s your entire fault, she’s so hairy.” (the man looked like Sasquatch!) So when I saw Peter’s head crowning in the mirror, I yelled, “Are you sure that’s his head?” He was as bald as Uncle Fester! If that’s not bad enough, when I first saw his face I thought, “OMG, he looks just like my mother-in-law”. Imagine that!
It was with my second, Peter, that I really let go of the stupid breastfeeding advice given to me with my first. My hospital room mate, Mari was an integral part of that. (yes, we shared rooms back then!) She also VBAC’d with the same OB, so we instantly bonded. Mari was the one who opened my mind to a whole new way of thinking. “Just nurse him whenever he wants, that’s what I do”, she said, “It’s easy.’ I thought, if she can do it, so can I ....and I never looked at a clock again.
Peter breastfed for 22 months and we enjoyed every minute of it. I actually nursed him through 7 months of my pregnancy with Andrea. Eventually, he replaced nursing with putting his hand down my shirt between my breasts (very sweet!) Two months later, I delivered Andrea and happily started all over again!
Now that I think of it, I haven’t stopped feeding Peter yet. I'm making him dinner tonight for his birthday!
Since my kids are grown and I don't breastfeed, co-sleep, cuddle or hold their little hands much anymore, (they just won't let me!) I live my life vicariously through all of you. Thank you for sharing your precious babies with me! May your memories of this time be as vivid and happy as mine.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)











